4.6 Article

Adaptation of human influenza H3N2 virus in a mouse pneumonitis model: insights into viral virulence, tissue tropism and host pathogenesis

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 2-11

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.09.013

关键词

Hemagglutinin; Influenza virus; Mouse model; Mutations; NS1; Pathogenesis; Virus adaptation

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore
  2. Microbiology Vaccine Initiative
  3. National University of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most pandemic influenza virus strains undergo adaptation or reassortment before they acquire the ability to cause fatal infections in a new host species. The pathologic changes and tissue tropism during virus adaptation are not fully understood. Here we investigated pathologic changes and tissue tropism by serial lung-to-lung passaging of human influenza virus strain A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) in a BALB/c mouse model. Enhanced pulmonary lesions and systemic virus infection were observed during adaptation. Late passage 10 (P10) virus caused extra-pulmonary spread with necrotic and inflammatory lesions in the brain, heart, spleen and intestine of infected animals, in contrast to infection with earlier passage viruses which were restricted to lungs. Non-conservative mutations in the hemagglutinin (Gly218Glu) and non-structural 1 (Asp125Gly) proteins were identified in P10 virus which exhibited high virulence. Virus growth kinetics showed enhanced replication ability of P10 virus in different cell lines. P10 virus also exhibited the ability to bind to erythrocytes of different host species. These results demonstrate extra-pulmonary spread of influenza virus during adaptation with enhanced replication ability in a new host. This mouse adaptation model may provide a basis for understanding cross-species adaptability corresponding to increased virulence of the influenza A virus, a phenomenon of relevance to the emergence of future highly pathogenic strains. (c) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据