4.1 Article

A Comparative Study of the Bacterial Community in Denitrifying and Traditional Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Processes

期刊

MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 261-268

出版社

JAPANESE SOC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, DEPT BIORESOURCE SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13132

关键词

EBPR; denitrifying phosphorous removal; microbial community; pyrosequencing

资金

  1. China Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollutant Control and Treatment [2012ZX07313001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200104]
  3. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JC201105160582A]
  4. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2012040006350]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510975]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Denitrifying phosphorus removal is an attractive wastewater treatment process due to its reduced carbon source demand and sludge minimization potential. Two lab-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) were operated in alternating anaerobic-anoxic (A-A) or anaerobic-oxic (A-O) conditions to achieve denitrifying enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR) and traditional EBPR. No significant differences were observed in phosphorus removal efficiencies between A-A SBR and A-O SBR, with phosphorus removal rates being 87.9% and 89.0% respectively. The community structures in denitrifying and traditional EBPR processes were evaluated by high-throughput sequencing of the PCR-amplified partial 16S rRNA genes from each sludge. The results obtained showed that the bacterial community was more diverse in A-O sludge than in A-A sludge. Taxonomy and beta-diversity analyses indicated that a significant shift occurred in the dominant microbial community in A-A sludge compared with the seed sludge during the whole acclimation phase, while a slight fluctuation was observed in the abundance of the major taxonomies in A-O sludge. One Dechloromonas-related OTU outside the 4 known Candidatus Accumulibacter clades was detected as the main OTU in A-A sludge at the stationary operation, while Candidatus Accumulibacter dominated in A-O sludge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据