4.7 Article

Advances of thermal conductivity models of nanoscale silica aerogel insulation material

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 28-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.013

关键词

Nanoporous silica aerogel insulation material; Effective thermal conductivity; Gaseous heat transfer; Solid heat transfer; Radiative heat transfer

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51436007]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB228304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper summarized the development of the effective thermal conductivity models for the nanoporous silica aerogel insulation material. Firstly, the nanoscale heat transfer characteristics inside aerogel material was introduced. Secondly, the existing models and methods to calculate the thermal conductivity of each heat transfer mode at the nanoscale were reviewed. Next, the advances and developments of the effective thermal conductivity models for the nanoporous silica aerogel materials as well as its composite insulation material were also discussed. Then the procedure of establishing the effective thermal conductivity model of the aerogel insulation material from nanoscale to macroscale was introduced by taking our previous work as an illustration. Finally, it should be noted that for the nanoporous silica aerogel insulation material, there are still some key issues that need to be investigated to get deep understanding of the mechanism of nanoscale heat transfer inside the material, such as the coupled heat transfer behavior at the gas-solid contact interface, the influence of scale effect/interfacial effect on the thermal conductivity of nanoscale solid particles, etc. Thus it is necessary to keep on investigating these questions thoroughly to provide help for establishing more accurate heat transfer model as well as optimizing the insulation performance of the material. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据