4.5 Article

Fluid Flow Characteristics and Porosity Behavior in Full Penetration Laser Welding of a Titanium Alloy

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-014-0242-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [253487, 919487]
  2. Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a computational fluid mechanics model is developed for full penetration laser welding of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. This has been used to analyze possible porosity formation mechanisms, based on predictions of keyhole behavior and fluid flow characteristics in the weld pool. Numerical results show that when laser welding 3 mm thickness titanium alloy sheets with given laser beam focusing optics, keyhole depth oscillates before a full penetration keyhole is formed, but thereafter keyhole collapses are not predicted numerically. For lower power, lower speed welding, the fluid flow behind the keyhole is turbulent and unstable, and vortices are formed. Molten metal is predicted to flow away from the center plane of the weld pool, and leave a gap or void within the weld pool behind the keyhole. For higher power, higher speed welding, fluid flow is less turbulent, and such vortices are not formed. Corresponding experimental results show that porosity was absent in the melt runs made at higher power and higher welding speed. In contrast, large pores were present in melt runs made at lower power and lower welding speed. Based on the combination of experimental results and numerical predictions, it is proposed that porosity formation when keyhole laser welding may result from turbulent fluid flow behind the keyhole, with the larger the value of associated Reynolds number, the higher the possibility of porosity formation. For such fluid flow controlled porosities, measures to decrease Reynolds number of the fluid flow close to the keyhole could prove effective in reducing or avoiding porosity. (C) The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2014

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据