4.5 Article

Thermal Conductivity Measurements of Some Synthetic Al2O3-CaO-SiO2 Slags by Means of a Front-Heating and Front-Detection Laser-Flash Method

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-012-9702-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. KAKENHI, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23360332, 15560640]
  2. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices, Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials Division of Materials, Tohoku University
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24656565, 23360332, 15560640] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal conductivities of some synthetic slags containing Al2O3, CaO, and SiO2 have been determined in the temperature range between 1623 K (1350 A degrees C) and 1823 K (1550 A degrees C) by applying a front-heating front-detection laser-flash method. In this method, the temperature response curve is measured in the short initial time period immediately after irradiating a laser pulse. The resultant values obtained by this method are unaffected by the radiative heat transfer. The temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity values were found not to be significant for all slag samples currently investigated. The thermal conductivity (lambda) of samples is represented with standard deviation less than 2 pct of its value as a function of compositions as follows: lambda= -0.48[Al2O3 - 0.57[CaO] - 0.55[SiO2] + 57.1 W m(-1) K-1 where [Al2O3], [CaO], and [SiO2] are molar percent of Al2O3, CaO and SiO2, respectively. The equation is suggested to cover the region of the following compositions: 8.0 mol pct < Al2O3 < 21.0 mol pct, 31.5 mol pct < CaO < 41.5 mol pct and 43.0 mol pct < SiO2 < 58.1 mol pct. The addition of Al2O3 to slags with a constant CaO/SiO2 molar ratio resulted in an increase in thermal conductivity. In contrast, the effects of addition of SiO2 and CaO are found to be insignificant. DOI: 10.1007/s11663-012-9702-y (C) The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据