4.4 Article

A novel cyclometallated Pt(II)-ferrocene complex induces nuclear FOXO3a localization and apoptosis and synergizes with cisplatin to inhibit lung cancer cell proliferation

期刊

METALLOMICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 622-633

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3mt00194f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of Spain [CTQ2009-11501, CTQ2009-07021, SAF2011-25726]
  2. FEDER Funds
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III and European Regional Development Fund (ISCIII-RTICC) [RD06/0020/0046]
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR-1308, 2009SGR-1111, 2009 CTP 00026]
  5. European Commission [PITN-GA-2010-264780, FP7-ICT-2009-270086]
  6. COSMOS research infrastructures grant [312941]
  7. Icrea Academia award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cisplatin is a platinum-based compound that acts as an alkylating agent and is used to treat a variety of malignant tumors including lung cancer. As cisplatin has significant limitations in the clinic, alternative platinum compounds such as cycloplatinated complexes have been considered as attractive anti-tumor agents. Here, we report the antiproliferative activity of a novel diastereomerically pure cycloplatinated complex (S-p,1S,2R)-[Pt{(kappa(2)-C,N)[(eta(5)-C5H3)-CH-N-CH(Me)-CH(OH)-C6H5] Fe(eta(5)-C5H5)}Cl(DMSO)] 6a, against A549 non-small cell lung cancer. Mechanistic studies revealed that compound 6a induces nuclear translocation of a FOXO3a reporter protein as well as endogenous FOXO3a in U2OS and A549 cells, respectively. Accordingly, treatment of A549 cells with compound 6a activates the intrinsic caspase pathway and dramatically increases the percentage of apoptotic cells. Furthermore, 6a displays a synergistic antiproliferative effect when applied together with cisplatin. Compound 6a is also active in other cancer cell lines including NCI-H460 large cell lung cancer cells. Importantly, antiproliferative activity of the platinacycle 6a on the non-tumor and non-proliferating 3T3-L1 cell line is weaker than in all cancer cell lines tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据