4.4 Article

Untargeted urine metabolomics reveals a biosignature for muscle respiratory chain deficiencies

期刊

METABOLOMICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 111-121

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-014-0675-5

关键词

Respiratory chain deficiency; Metabolomics; Urinary biomarker; LC-MS

资金

  1. North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system. Most often for mitochondrial disease, where no metabolic diagnostic biomarkers exist, a deficiency is diagnosed after analysing the respiratory chain enzymes (complexes I-IV) in affected tissues or by identifying one of an ever expanding number of DNA mutations. This presents a great challenge to identify cases to undergo the invasive diagnostic procedures required. An untargeted liquid chromatography mass spectrometry metabolomics approach was used to search for a metabolic biosignature that can distinguish respiratory chain deficient (RCD) patients from clinical controls (CC). A cohort of 37 ethnically diverse cases was used. Sample preparation, liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry methods and data processing methods were standardised. Furthermore the developed methodology used reverse phase chromatography in conjunction with positive electrospray ionisation and hydrophilic interaction chromatography with negative electrospray ionisation. Urine samples of 37 patients representing two different experimental groups were analysed. The two experimental groups comprised of patients with confirmed RCDs and CC. After a variety of data mining steps and statistical analyses a list of 12 features were compiled with the ability to distinguish between patients with RCDs and CC. Although the features of the biosignature needs to be identified and the biosignature validated, this study demonstrates the value of untargeted metabolomics to identify a metabolic biosignature to possibly be applied in the selection criteria for RCDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据