4.4 Article

Metabonomic fingerprints of fasting plasma and spot urine reveal human pre-diabetic metabolic traits

期刊

METABOLOMICS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 362-374

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-010-0203-1

关键词

Metabolomics; UPLC-qTOF-MS; Diabetes; Pre-diabetes; Impaired glucose tolerance

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FKZ 01GI0803-04]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20675082]
  3. Sino-German Center for Research Promotion (DFG and NSFC) [GZ 364]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB503902]
  5. State Ministry of Science & Technology of China [2006BAK02A12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) which precedes overt type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for decades is associated with multiple metabolic alterations in insulin sensitive tissues. In an UPLC-qTOF-mass spectrometry-driven non-targeted metabonomics approach we investigated plasma as well as spot urine of 51 non-diabetic, overnight fasted individuals aiming to separate subjects with IGT from controls thereby identify pathways affected by the pre-diabetic metabolic state. We could clearly demonstrate that normal glucose tolerant (NGT) and IGT subjects clustered in two distinct groups independent of the investigated metabonome. These findings reflect considerable differences in individual metabolite fingerprints, both in plasma and urine. Pre-diabetes associated alterations in fatty acid-, tryptophan-, uric acid-, bile acid-, and lysophosphatidylcholine-metabolism, as well as the TCA cycle were identified. Of note, individuals with IGT also showed decreased levels of gut flora-associated metabolites namely hippuric acid, methylxanthine, methyluric acid, and 3-hydroxyhippuric acid. The findings of our non-targeted UPLC-qTOF-MS metabonomics analysis in plasma and spot urine of individuals with IGT vs NGT offers novel insights into the metabolic alterations occurring in the long, asymptomatic period preceding the manifestation of T2DM thereby giving prospects for new intervention targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据