4.7 Article

Reproducibility and validity of ultrasound for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues

期刊

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 1512-1519

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.07.012

关键词

Reproducibility; Validity; Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Abdominal fat compartments

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01ER1001A-I]
  2. Helmholtz Association
  3. participating universities and Institutes of the Leibniz Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Ultrasound represents a low-cost and widely available field method for assessing visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) but its measurement properties are uncertain. The aim of the current study was to examine the reproducibility and validity of ultrasound to quantify abdominal fat compartments. Methods. In two study centers, VAT and SAT thicknesses were quantified by ultrasound two times by two observers each among 127 adults aged 20-70 years. In a separate sample of 30 adults, the ultrasound method was validated by comparing VAT and SAT thicknesses with VAT and SAT areas at vertebrae L2/L3 as obtained by a single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slice. Results. For VAT, the intra-rater reproducibility values for observers 1 and 2 were r = 0.996 (95% CI = 0.994-0.997) and r = 0.999 (95% CI = 0.999-0.999), respectively. For SAT, the intra-rater reproducibility values were r = 0.992 (95% CI = 0.989-0.994) and r = 0.993 (95% CI = 0.990-0.995), respectively. The inter-rater reproducibility values for VAT and SAT were r = 0.998 (95% CI = 0.997-0.999) and r = 0.990 (95% CI = 0.986-0.993), respectively. For VAT and SAT, the correlation coefficients between ultrasound and MRI measurements were r = 0.898 (P < 0.001) and r = 0.705 (P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion. Ultrasound provides reproducible and valid estimates of VAT and SAT and represents a useful method to assess abdominal fat in large scale epidemiologic studies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据