4.7 Article

Hepatic glucose production pathways after three days of a high-fat diet

期刊

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 152-162

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.07.012

关键词

High-fat diet; Glycerol; Hepatic insulin resistance; NMR; Glucose production

资金

  1. N.I.H. [DK078933, RR-02584]
  2. VA Merit Review Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. A three-day high-fat diet induces hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance in rats without altering fasting plasma glucose concentration or the rate of glucose production. However, as the nutrient profile available to the liver is substantially altered by a high-fat diet, we hypothesized that the relative fluxes supporting hepatic glucose production would be altered. Materials/Methods. To test this hypothesis, we used multiple tracers ([3,4-C-13(2)]glucose, (H2O)-H-2, and [U-C-13(3)]propionate) followed by NMR analysis of blood glucose to quantify net glucose production and the contributions of glycogen and key gluconeogenesis precursors in 4-5-h fasted rats. Results. NMR analysis demonstrated that the majority of blood glucose was derived from glycogen and the citric acid cycle, while a smaller fraction of glucose was derived from glycerol in both controls and high-fat-fed animals. High-fat feeding was associated with a two-fold increase in plasma glycerol concentration and an increase in the contribution (both fractional and absolute) of glycerol-gluconeogenesis. The increase in gluconeogenesis from glycerol tended to be balanced by a decrease in glycogenolysis. The absolute fluxes associated with the citric acid cycle including gluconeogenesis from the cycle intermediates, pyruvate cycling and the citric acid cycle flux itself, were not altered by this short high-fat diet. Conclusions. A short term high-fat diet altered the specific pathways for hepatic glucose production without influencing the overall rate of glucose production or flux in the citric acid cycle. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据