4.7 Article

Genome-scale identification and characterization of ethanol tolerance genes in Escherichia coli

期刊

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 124-133

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.10.007

关键词

Ethanol; Tolerance; Selections; E. coli; Strain engineering; Metabolic engineering

资金

  1. NSF [CBET0449183]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E036252/1]
  3. Bioprocess Research Industry Club (BRIC) [BB/F004842/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of relevant gene targets for engineering a desired trait is a key step in combinatorial strain engineering. Here, we applied the multi-Scalar Analysis of Library Enrichments (SCALEs) approach to map ethanol tolerance onto 1,000,000 genomic-library clones in Escherichia coli. We assigned fitness scores to each of the similar to 4,300 genes in E. coli, and through follow-up confirmatory studies identified 9 novel genetic targets (12 genes total) that increase E. coli ethanol tolerance (up to 6-fold improved growth). These genetic targets are involved in the processes related to cell membrane composition, translation, serine biosynthesis, and transcription regulation. Transcriptional profiling of the ethanol stress response in 5 of these ethanol-tolerant clones revealed a total of 700 genes with significantly altered expression (mapped to 615 significantly enriched gene ontology terms) across all five clones, with similar overall changes in global gene expression between two clone clusters. All ethanol-tolerant clones analyzed shared 6% of the overexpressed genes and showed enrichment for transcription regulation-related GO terms. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of ethanol-tolerant strains identified upregulation of proteins related to ROS mitigation, fatty acid biosynthesis, and vitamin biosynthesis as compared to the parent strain's ethanol response. The approach we outline here will be useful for engineering a variety of other traits and further improvements in alcohol tolerance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据