4.5 Article

Elevated cerebral glutamate and myo-inositol levels in cognitively normal middle-aged adults with metabolic syndrome

期刊

METABOLIC BRAIN DISEASE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 397-405

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11011-010-9221-y

关键词

Metabolic syndrome; (1)H MRS; Glutamate; Myo-inositol; Cognition; Aging

资金

  1. American Heart Association [09BGIA2060722]
  2. University of Texas at Austin
  3. NINR Center [P30 NR005051]
  4. NIH [AG20966, DA018431]
  5. Yoga Care Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of risk factors associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and diminished cognitive function. Given that the cerebral mechanisms mediating the relationship between peripheral metabolic dysfunction and cognitive impairment are unknown, we set out to examine the relationship between diagnosis of metabolic syndrome and cerebral metabolism. Thirteen participants with MetS (aged 48 +/- 6 years) and 25 healthy adults (aged 51 +/- 6 years) underwent neuropsychological assessment, health screen and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) examining N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), myo-inositol (mI), creatine (Cr), choline (Cho), and glutamate (Glu) concentrations in occipitoparietal grey matter. Cerebral metabolite ratios (NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, mI/Cr, and Glu/Cr) of participants with MetS, defined by the International Diabetes Federation criteria, were compared with controls matched for age, education, cognition, and emotional function. There were no significant differences in global cognitive function, memory, language, and psychomotor performance between the groups. Diagnosis of MetS was associated with significantly higher mI/Cr (F(1,36) = 5.02, p = 0.031) and Glu/Cr ratio (F(1,36) = 4.81, p = 0.035). Even in cognitively normal adults, MetS is related to cerebral metabolic disturbances, a possible indication of early brain vulnerability. Longitudinal studies that begin in mid-life can help validate the use of (1)H MRS markers as indicators of long-term cognitive outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据