4.2 Article

Circulating natural killer and γδ T cells decrease soon after infection of rhesus macaques with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus

期刊

MEMORIAS DO INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 583-591

出版社

FUNDACO OSWALDO CRUZ
DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762009000400009

关键词

NK cells; gamma delta T; rhesus macaque; LCMV; hemorrhagic fever

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI5252367, RR138980, AI53620, AI53619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhesus macaques infected with the WE strain of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV-WE) serve as a model for human infection with Lassa fever virus. To identify the earliest events of acute infection, rhesus macaques were monitored immediately after lethal infection for changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Changes in CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD20 subsets did not vary outside the normal fluctuations of these blood cell populations; however, natural killer (NK) and gamma delta T cells increased slightly on day 1 and then decreased significantly after two days. The NK subsets responsible for the decrease were primarily CD3(-)CD8(+) or CD3(-)CD16(+) and not the NKT (primarily CD3(+)CD56(+)) subset. Macaques infected with a non-virulent arenavirus, LCMV-Armstrong, showed a similar drop in circulating NK and gamma delta T cells, indicating that this is not a pathogenic event. V gamma 9 T cells, representing the majority of circulating gamma delta T cells in rhesus macaques, displayed significant apoptosis when incubated with LCMV in cell culture; however, the low amount of cell death for virus-co-cultured NK cells was insufficient to account for the observed disappearance of this subset. Our observations in primates are similar to those seen in LCMV-infected mice, where decreased circulating NK cells were attributed to margination and cell death. Thus, the disappearance of these cells during acute hemorrhagic fever in rhesus macaques may be a cytokine-induced lymphopenia common to many virus infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据