4.2 Article

Superficial-spreading and nodular melanomas in Norway: a comparison by body site distribution and latitude gradients

期刊

MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 460-465

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e3283599cc3

关键词

body site; incidence; latitude; nodular melanoma; sun exposure; superficial-spreading melanoma

资金

  1. Research Foundation of the Norwegian Radium Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superficial-spreading melanoma (SSM) and nodular melanoma (NM) are the most common histological types of melanoma. These are seemingly distinct entities, on the basis of epidemiology, clinical behavior, tumor biological, and histological aspects as well as molecular characteristics. Intermittent sun exposure seems to play a major role in SSM, which has an increasing incidence rate during the last decades. However, relationship with sun exposure is more complex in the case of NM, as the latter may arise on any body part and has a more stable incidence rate. To obtain more information on the role of sun exposure in these two types of melanoma, we have compared body site distributions and latitude gradients for a period of 30 years in Norway. The study was based on official reports from the Cancer Registry of Norway, using melanoma incidence rates for a period of 30 years (1978-2007), by age, sex, anatomic site, and region of Norway. Our results show that in Norway, SSM is more strongly related to intermittent sun exposure than NM, as it arises mostly on the trunk as compared with the head and neck. Moreover, SSM has a higher incidence in the Southern regions of Norway, whereas for NM, the north-south gradient is not statistically significant. Differences in sun exposure at northern latitudes have a major impact on different types of melanoma. It seems that NM is less sun-induced than SSM, for which other etiological and pathogenetic factors may play important roles. Melanoma Res 22:460-465 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据