4.6 Article

Determinants of Expiratory Flow Limitation in Healthy Women during Exercise

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 1666-1674

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318214679d

关键词

DYSANAPSIS; EXPIRATORY FLOW LIMITATION; GENDER; LUNG MECHANICS

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. British Columbia Lung Association
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  4. Sir James Lougheed Award of Distinction
  5. John Alexander Stewart Fellowship
  6. Canadian Institutes for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DOMINELLI, P. B., J. A. GUENETTE, S. S. WILKIE, G. E. FOSTER, and A. W. SHEEL. Determinants of Expiratory Flow Limitation in Healthy Women during Exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1666-1674, 2011. Purpose: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can occur in healthy young women during exercise. We questioned whether the occurrence and severity of EFL were related to aerobic fitness or anatomical factors. Methods: Twenty-two healthy young (<40 yr) women performed a progressive cycle test to exhaustion. The subjects' maximum expiratory flow-volume curve was compiled from several effort-graded vital capacity maneuvers before and after exercise. The maximum expiratory flow-volume curve, along with inspiratory capacity maneuvers, was used to determine lung volumes and expiratory flows and to quantify EFL. To determine relative airway size, we used a ratio sensitive to both airway size and lung volume, called the dysanapsis ratio. The subjects were partitioned into two groups based upon the appearance of >5% EFL. Results: Ten subjects showed EFL during exercise. Forced vital capacities (4.4 +/- 0.4 vs 3.7 +/- 0.4 L, P < 0.001) and forced expiratory flows for any given lung volume were significantly larger in the non-expiratory flow-limited (NEFL) group. The NEFL group's dysanapsis ratio was significantly larger than that of the EFL group (0.27 +/- 0.06 vs 0.21 +/- 0.04, respectively, P < 0.05), indicating larger airways in the NEFL group. There was no difference between the NEFL and EFL groups with respect to maximal aerobic capacity (50.8 +/- 10.0 vs 46.7 +/- 5.9 mL.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively, P = 0.264). At peak exercise, the NEFL group had a significantly higher end-expiratory lung volume than the EFL group (40.1% +/- 4.8% vs 33.7% +/- 5.7% FVC, respectively, P < 0.05). Conclusions: We conclude that EFL in women can largely be explained by anatomical factors that influence the capacity to generate flow and volume during exercise rather than fitness per se.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据