4.6 Article

Evaluation of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Assessing Body Composition of Wrestlers

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 361-367

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b2e8b4

关键词

WRESTLING; FAT-FREE MASS; MINIMUM WRESTLING WEIGHT; BODY FAT; BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE

资金

  1. Biospace Co., Beverly Hills, CA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UTTER, A. C. and P. G. LAMBETH. Evaluation of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Assessing Body Composition of Wrestlers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 361-367, 2010. Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) in assessing fat-free mass (FFM) in comparison with hydrostatic weighing (HW) and skinfolds (SK) in high school wrestlers in a hydrated state. Methods: Body composition was determined by MFBIA, HW, and three-site SK in 72 high school wrestlers (mean +/- SD; age = 15.3 +/- 1.4 yr, height = 1.71 +/- 0.08 in, body mass = 67.3 +/- 13.4 kg). Hydration state was quantified by evaluating urine specific gravity. Results: There were no significant differences for estimated FFM between MFBIA (57.2 +/- 9.5 kg) and HW (57.0 +/- 10.1 kg) or SK (56.4 +/- 8.8 kg). The SEE for FFM with HW as the reference method were 2.73 kg for MFBIA and 2.66 kg for SK. Correlations were found for FFM between HW and MFBIA (r = 0.96, P < 0.001) and between HW and SK (r = 0.97, P < 0.001). A systematic bias was found for MFBIA because the difference between MFBIA and HW correlated with the FFM average of the two methods (r = -0.22, P < 0.001). A bias was also seen between SK and HW and correlated with the FFM average (r = -0.47, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that MFBIA provides similar estimates of FFM when compared with HW in a heterogeneous high school wrestling population during a hydrated state. MFBIA is an attractive assessment tool, easy to use, and may be considered as an alternative field-based method of estimating the FFM of high school wrestlers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据