4.6 Article

Increased protein maintains nitrogen balance during exercise-induced energy deficit

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 505-512

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815f6643

关键词

protein metabolism; protein intake; negative energy balance; stable isotopes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study examined how a high-protein diet affected nitrogen balance and protein turnover during an exercise-induced energy deficit. Methods: Twenty-two men completed a 4-d (D1-4) baseline period (BL) of an energy balance diet while maintaining usual physical activity level, followed by 7d(D5-11)of 1000 kcal.d(-1) increased energy expenditure via exercise (50-65% VO2peak). One group consumed 0.9 g of protein per kilogram per day and maintained energy balance throughout the 11-d intervention (BAL, N = 8). The other two groups consumed their BL energy intake throughout the I I days, resulting in a 7-d, 1000-kcal.d(-1) energy deficit. These groups consumed either 0.9 g of protein per kilogram per day (DEF, N = 7) or 1.8 g of protein per kilogram per day (DEF-HP, N = 7). Mean nitrogen balance (NB), calculated per kilogram of fat-free mass (FFM), was determined for BL, days 5-8 (EX1), and days 9-11 (EX2). Whole-body protein turnover was derived from phenylalanine and tyrosine kinetics assessed while fasting at rest on days 4, 7, and 12, using a priming dose of L-[ring-N-15]tyrosine and a 4-h, primed, continuous infusion of L-[N-15]phenylalanine and L-[ring-H-2(4)]tyrosine. Results: DEF experienced a decrease in NB from BL to EX 1 that was maintained in EX 2. No changes in NB occurred for BAL or DEF-HP over time. No within- or between-group differences were found over time for Phe flux (Q(p)), conversion rate of Phe to Tyr (Q(pt)), or the derived protein synthesis value (S-p). Conclusion: Increased dietary protein maintained NB during exercise-induced energy deficit, but this did not impact resting whole-body protein turnover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据