4.5 Review

The efficacy and safety of once-weekly DPP-4 inhibitor omarigliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus A systemic review and meta-analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 97, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011946

关键词

efficacy; meta-analysis; omarigliptin; safety; type 2 diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) omarigliptin as monotherapy or add on to other antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unclear. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from the inception to January 24, 2018. Randomized controlled trials comparing omarigliptin with placebo or other AHAs in T2DM patients were included in our meta-analysis. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to evaluate the outcomes. Results: Totally, 11 trials involving 8276 patients were satisfied with our inclusion criteria. Compared with control group, omarigliptin was associated with a significantly stronger reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (MD 0.38%, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.18, 0.58], P=.0002) and fasting plasma glucose (MD 0.48 mmol/L, 95% CI [0.14 mmol/L, 0.82 mmol/L], P=.006). Omarigliptin increased the number of participants who achieved HbA1c<7.0% compared with control group (RR 2.03, 95% CI [1.38, 2.98], P=.0003). No significant difference was found in the aspect of adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI [0.97, 1.03], P=.99), serious adverse events (RR 1.02, 95% CI [0.91, 1.13], P=.75), hypoglycemic events (RR 0.86, 95% CI [0.48, 1.54], P=.61) between omarigliptin and control group. Omarigliptin has a homologous efficacy and safety background to other AHAs according to the results of subgroup analysis. Conclusions: This review revealed that omarigliptin had a favorable efficacy and safety as monotherapy or add on to other AHAs in treating T2DM patients. It is a superior choice for T2DM patients who have a poor adherence to daily AHAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据