4.7 Article

Effects of Interface Behavior on Fracture Spacing in Layered Rock

期刊

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1733-1746

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-015-0852-5

关键词

Layered rock; Fracture spacing; Interface debonding; Shear strength

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51304067, 41172244]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Programs) [2014CB047100]
  3. Distinguished Young Scholars of Henan Polytechnic University [J2015-1]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province [NSFRF140206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand the periodically distributed fractures in rock sequences, the effects of the layer interfaces on the evolution of the stress distribution in a fracture-bound block and on the fracture infilling process are discussed. A three-layer model is developed based on a cohesive zone model (CZM) for layer interfaces and a plastic-damaged model for rock layers. The results indicate that the interface shear strength can greatly influence the stress distribution in a fracture-bound block so that the ratio of the fracture spacing to the layer thickness (S/T-f) is not the dominant factor in the stress state. If interface debonding occurs, the tensile stress in a fracture-bound block can decrease to zero even for a higher S/T-f ratio. If the interface shear strength is high enough, a new fracture can further infill between two adjacent preexisting fractures even if the S/T-f ratio is at a low level. The fracture process implies that there is a critical value for the interfacial shear strength that controls the fracture pattern between the central layer and its neighboring layers to be either interface debonding or layer-parallel fracture. Both interfacial debonding and layer-parallel fracture can separate the central layer from its neighboring layers and thus lead to fracture saturation. Further analysis indicates that the critical shear strength increases linearly with increasing tensile strength of the central layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据