4.5 Article

Interval type-2 fuzzy logic based multiclass ANFIS algorithm for real-time EEG based movement control of a robot arm

期刊

ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 104-115

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.01.007

关键词

Real-time control; Interval type-2 fuzzy system; Adaptive neural fuzzy inference system; Multi-class classification; Motor imagery

资金

  1. University Grants Commission, India
  2. University of Potential Excellence Programme (Phase II) in Cognitive Science
  3. Jadavpur University
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [9/96(716)2K12-EMR-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain-computer interfacing is an emerging field of research where signals extracted from the human brain are used for decision making and generation of control signals. Selection of the right classifier to detect the mental states from electroencephalography (EEG) signal is an open area of reseatch because of the signal's non-stationary and Ergodic nature. Though neural network based classifiers, like Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), act efficiently, to deal with the uncertainties involved in EEG signals, we have introduced interval type-2 fuzzy system in the fray to improve its uncertainty handling. Also, real-time scenarios require a classifier to detect more than two mental states. Thus, a multi-class discriminating algorithm based on the fusion of interval type-2 fuzzy logic and ANFIS, is introduced in this paper. Two variants of this algorithm have been developed on the basis of One-Vs-All and One-Vs-One methods. Both the variants have been tested on an experiment involving the real-time control of robot arm, where both the variants of the proposed classifier, produces an average success rate of reaching a target to 65% and 70% respectively. The result shows the competitiveness of our algorithm over other standard ones in the domain of non-stationary and uncertain signal data classification. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据