4.3 Article

Longitudinal Plankton Dynamics in the Rivers Rhine and Elbe

期刊

RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1264-1278

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rra.2977

关键词

phytoplankton; zooplankton; plankton dynamics; potamoplankton; eutrophication; Lagrangian approach; large rivers; bivalves

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared the longitudinal plankton development in the two large rivers Rhine and Elbe by means of four Lagrangian sampling campaigns performed within the time span 2009-2011. The campaigns revealed low chlorophyll concentrations in the Rhine along a long river stretch (Rhine-km170 to 854) with maximum values below 5 mu gL(-1) in 2010. In contrast, the Elbe (Elbe-km4 to 582) showed high and longitudinally increasing chlorophyll concentrations with maximal values of 174 mu gL(-1) in 2009 and 123 mu gL(-1) in 2011. Additional samples of the benthic bivalves along the river stretches revealed high densities of the filter feeders in the Rhine that could potentially explain losses of plankton production. Their densities in the Elbe were significantly lower, making important losses to benthic filter feeders unlikely. However, strong phytoplankton growth was observed during the sampling campaign in 2011 in the Rhine coinciding with a low discharge event. This resulted in an exceptionally high chlorophyll value of up to 244 mu gL(-1) in the lower river sections, a value that was not reached in the last two decades of continuous water quality monitoring in the Rhine. Even though we cannot fully explain this phenomenon, it shows that phytoplankton has a high growth potential in the Rhine but is usually controlled by other mechanisms. Tributaries represented an additional and important source of plankton biomass and suspended substances in the Rhine, whereas they primarily diluted the plankton concentrations in the Elbe. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据