4.6 Article

Methods to Explore Uncertainty and Bias Introduced by Job Exposure Matrices

期刊

RISK ANALYSIS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 74-82

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12438

关键词

Bayesian methods; bias analysis; epidemiology; job exposure matrices; occupational risks; sensitivity analysis

资金

  1. CDC-NIOSH [1R21OH009901-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Job exposure matrices (JEMs) are used to measure exposures based on information about particular jobs and tasks. JEMs are especially useful when individual exposure data cannot be obtained. Nonetheless, there may be other workplace exposures associated with the study disease that are not measured in available JEMs. When these exposures are also associated with the exposures measured in the JEM, biases due to uncontrolled confounding will be introduced. Furthermore, individual exposures differ from JEM measurements due to differences in job conditions and worker practices. Uncertainty may also be present at the assessor level since exposure information for each job may be imprecise or incomplete. Assigning individuals a fixed exposure determined by the JEM ignores these uncertainty sources. We examine the uncertainty displayed by bias analyses in a study of occupational electric shocks, occupational magnetic fields, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据