4.6 Article

Digital tomosynthesis of the chest for lung nodule detection: Interim sensitivity results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 2554-2557

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.2937277

关键词

tomosynthesis; pulmonary nodules; chest radiography

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA080490]
  2. GE Health care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors report interim clinical results from an ongoing NIH-sponsored trial to evaluate digital chest tomosynthesis for improving detectability of small lung nodules. Twenty-one patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) to follow up lung nodules were consented and enrolled to receive an additional digital PA chest radiograph and digital tomosynthesis exam. Tomosynthesis was performed with a commercial CsI/alpha-Si flat-panel detector and a custom-built tube mover. Seventy-one images were acquired in 11 s, reconstructed with the matrix inversion tomosynthesis algorithm at 5-mm plane spacing, and then averaged (seven planes) to reduce noise and low-contrast artifacts. Total exposure for tomosynthesis imaging was equivalent to that of 11 digital PA radiographs (comparable to a typical screen-film lateral radiograph or two digital lateral radiographs). CT scans (1.25-mm section thickness) were reviewed to confirm presence and location of nodules. Three chest radiologists independently reviewed tomosynthesis images and PA chest radiographs to confirm visualization of nodules identified by CT. Nodules were scored as: definitely visible, uncertain, or not visible. 175 nodules (diameter range 3.5-25.5 mm) were seen by CT and grouped according to size: < 5, 5-10, and > 10 mm. When considering as true positives only nodules that were scored definitely visible, sensitivities for all nodules by tomosynthesis and PA radiography were 70% (+/- 5%) and 22% (+/- 4%), respectively, (p < 0.0001). Digital tomosynthesis showed significantly improved sensitivity of detection of known small lung nodules in all three size groups, when compared to PA chest radiography. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据