4.6 Article

A registration based approach for 4D cardiac micro-CT using combined prospective and retrospective gating

期刊

MEDICAL PHYSICS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 1170-1179

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.2868778

关键词

x-ray; micro-CT; small animal; cardiac; image reconstruction; 4D CT; low dose

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U24 CA092656, R21 CA124584-02, R21 CA124584-01, 5R21 CA114680, R21 CA114680, R21 CA114680-02, U24 CA092656-08, R21 CA124584] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR005959, P41 RR005959-18] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in murine cardiac studies with three-dimensional cone beam micro-computed tomography (CT) have used either prospective or retrospective gating technique. While prospective gating ensures the best image quality and the highest resolution, it involves longer sampling times and higher radiation dose. Sampling is faster and the radiation dose can be reduced with retrospective gating but the image quality is affected by the limited number of projections with an irregular angular distribution which complicate the reconstruction process, causing significant streaking artifacts. This work involves both prospective and retrospective gating in sampling. Deformable registration is used between a high quality image set acquired with prospective gating with the multiple data sets during the cardiac cycle obtained using retrospective gating. Tests were conducted on a four-dimensional (4D) cardiac mouse phantom and after optimization, the method was applied to in vivo cardiac micro-CT data. Results indicate that, by using our method, the sampling time can be reduced by a factor of 2.5 and the radiation dose can be reduced 35% compared to the prospective sampling while the image quality can be maintained. In conclusion, we proposed a novel solution to 4D cine cardiac micro-CT based on a combined prospective with retrospective gating in sampling and deformable registration post reconstruction that mixed the advantages of both strategies. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据