4.4 Article

Predictive value of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0339-0

关键词

Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma; PET/CT; Prognosis; SUVmax

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role odiagnosed ENKL. The SUVmax may provide additional prognostic information for IPI and KPI.f (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKL) is not well established. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of the pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed ENKL. Among 364 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed ENKL, 81 patients were included and reviewed. The impact of SUVmax on survival and the relationship between SUVmax and other clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. The median SUVmax was 14.6 (range 2.0-45.4). The optimal cutoff value of SUVmax to predict overall survival (OS) was 15. Patients with high SUVmax (SUVmax > 15) were associated with bulky disease (P<0.001), local invasion (P = 0.030), high score of Korean Prognostic Index (KPI, P = 0.046), resistance to primary treatment (P = 0.014), poor OS (P<0.001), and unfavorable progression-free survival (P<0.001). With a median follow-up of 25.0 months, the median OS was 63.0 months (range 2.0-99.0 months). Multivariate analyses revealed the following independent prognostic factors for OS: age > 60 years (P = 0.001), stage III-IV (P = 0.023), SUVmax > 15 (P = 0.020), and bulky disease (>5 cm) (P = 0.002). By using the SUVmax, patients in most subgroups stratified by the KPI or the International Prognostic Index (IPI) were further discriminated in OS with significant statistical difference. Our results suggest the pretreatment SUVmax is predictive of prognosis in patients with newly

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据