4.4 Article

High expression of S100A11 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an unfavorable prognostic marker

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 1886-1891

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0058-y

关键词

Pancreatic carcinoma; S100A11; Prognostic factor; Immunohistochemical analysis

类别

资金

  1. Foundation for Talents in Six Fields of Jiangsu Province [2006073]
  2. Health Project of Jiangsu Province [H200923]
  3. Social Development Foundation of Nantong City [S2007028, S2010012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S100A11 is a member of S100 protein family, and our previous study showed that S100A11 is one of the up-regulated proteins that have not been reported to be associated with pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between S100A11 expression and the clinicopathological variables and clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed for S100A11 in 78 pairs of specimens of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues. The univariate and multivariate survival analyses were also performed to determine its prognostic significance. S100A11 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (62/78) was significantly higher than that in the adjacent nontumorous tissues (19/78) (P = 0.000). High expression of S100A11 was associated with the lymph node metastasis and histological differentiation (P = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that S100A11 expression was associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.0000). Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model indicated that age >= 65 years, CA19-9 >= 1,000 U/ml and positive S100A11 were independent prognostic indicators of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P = 0.002, 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). These results suggested that S100A11 might be a significant tumor marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and an unfavorable predictor for prognosis of patients who have undergone surgical resection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据