4.4 Article

The biological behavior of SDF-1/CXCR4 in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 1202-1208

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-9943-7

关键词

SDF-1; Migration; Adhesion; Myelodysplastic syndromes

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the biological behavior of stromal cell-derived factor-l (SDF-1) in migration, adhesion, and apoptosis as well as the related signaling transduction pathways in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We chose 22 patients with MDS, 7 patients with de novo AML, and 8 patients with non-clonal cytopenia diseases. We performed flow cytometric analysis of CD34(+) cells apoptosis using annexinV-FITC, which binds to exposed phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells. The cell adhesion capability was detected by CCK-8 assay. The migration ability of the cell was checked by transwell assay. Furthermore, we measured SDF-1 levels in BM plasma from patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Our results indicated that the apoptosis of CD34(+) cell was significantly increased in the Low-grade MDS (IPSS score a parts per thousand currency sign 1.0) patients compared with the high-grade MDS (IPSS score a parts per thousand yen 1.5) (21.33% vs. 7.27%, P < 0.001) and patients with de novo AML (21.33% vs. 7.53%, P < 0.001). SDF-1 promoted CXCR4 high expression cells adhesion to the stroma cells (MSC) and induced these cells migration. SDF-1 could trigger the occurrence of polarized morphology of the cells that expressed CXCR4 high. After addition of wortmannin or PTX, the ability of adhesion and migration of the cells that expressed CXCR4 high decreased. But in the patient's cells that expressed CXCR4 low, there was no above-mentioned phenomenon. So we can suppose that the signaling pathway of SDF-1/CXCR4 axis is PI3K pathway, and we should do more things about this pathway and may find out the target treatment of MDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据