4.4 Article

Clinical implications of mismatched repair gene promoter methylation in pancreatic cancer

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 970-976

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-9968-y

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; hMLH1; hMSH2; Methylation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the relationship between the hypermethylation statuses of the mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2) promoters and explore the correlation between it and the development of pancreatic cancer and the biological behavior of pancreatic cancer. We selected 90 patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and underwent radical operations in the First Affiliated Hospital of the Dalian Medical University between January 2002 and June 2008. The methylation status of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 promoters was detected by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). Meanwhile, the expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemistry, and its correlation with biological behavior of pancreatic cancer was explored. Of the 90 cases, hMLH1 promoter methylation was detected in 54 (60.0%) patients, while none of the paracancerous tissues indicated methylation. In the study, the hMLH1-methylated tumors lost hMLH1 protein expression, but the non-hMLH1-methylated tumors were not seen to have a loss of hMLH1 protein expression (P < 0.001). On the other hand, there were four cases of hMSH2 promoter methylation. However, no significant difference was found between hMSH2 promoter methylation and non-hMSH2 promoter methylation cases (P > 0.05). After universal analysis, hMLH1 expression was significantly related to tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and tumor location (P < 0.05) while not related to the age, sex, and tumor size (P > 0.05). Our study suggests that the mismatch repair genes play an important role in pancreatic cancer carcinogenesis and progression through epigenetic modification, and it may be regarded as a potential target for the management of pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据