4.1 Review

One-year prevalence of migraine using a validated extended French version of the ID Migraine™: A Belgian population-based study

期刊

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
卷 171, 期 10, 页码 707-714

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.04.009

关键词

Migraine; Prevalence; Socio-demographic factors; Health indicators; Migraine with aura

资金

  1. INTERREG IVA program, Greater Region
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NESCAV] [39/GR/3/3/056]
  3. Walloon Region
  4. University of Liege in Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. - Country-specific prevalence data on migraine and comorbidities are vital to assess the public health burden of migraine and the corresponding resources required for proper management. Considering the absence of reliable statistics, this study aimed to estimate the one-year prevalence of migraine in Wallonia (Belgium) in relation to sociodemographic factors and several health indicators. Methods. - Among the 1071 people aged 20-69 years who participated in the NESCaV survey, 751 (70.1%) were screened for one-year migraine attacks using the ef-ID Migraine, a validated, extended French version of the self-administered ID Migraine (TM) questionnaire. Socio-demographic and health data were collected with a self-administered questionnaire and a physical examination. Results. - The overall one-year prevalence of migraine was 25.8%; 40.8% of migraineurs reported visual symptoms compatible with an aura. The prevalence was higher in women than in men (33.9% vs. 17.9%, P < 0.0001) and declined markedly after the age of 50 (P = 0.005). Importantly, migraine was associated with the subjective feeling of poorer health (P = 0.0004). No other socio-demographic factor or health indicator studied was significantly correlated with migraine. Conclusions. - High prevalence of migraine and strong association with feeling of poor health should incite health authorities to institute more active public health and management policies with regards to the migraine problem. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据