4.6 Article

Lessons learned from 20 years of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

期刊

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
卷 196, 期 1, 页码 67-70

出版社

AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD
DOI: 10.5694/mja11.10686

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare three cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening strategies used in Victoria since 1989. Design, setting and participants: Retrospective review of newborn screening and clinical records for people with CF born in Victoria between 1989 and 2008 to compare screening strategies: repeat immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) testing (IRT/IRT, 1989-1990), IRT and p.F508de1 mutation analysis (IRT/p.F508del, 1991-2006) and IRT with analysis of 12 CFTR mutations (IRT/12 mutations, 2007-2008). Main outcome measures: Total number of infants screened, people identified with CF (by screening or clinical diagnosis), number of CF-affected terminations of pregnancy, and number of carriers detected. Results: There were 420 people born with CF (live-birth prevalence, 1/3139; 95% CI, 1/2853-1/3462) and 78 CF-affected pregnancy terminations (overall prevalence, 1/2647; 95% CI, 1/2425-1/2896). Of the babies born with CF. 283 (67.40/0) were detected by newborn screening alone, 61 (14.5%) had meconium ileus, 33 (7.9%) had a family history of CF, nine (2.1%) were diagnosed antenatally, and 34 (8.1%) were missed by screening (17 missed because IRT level was <99th percentile, two with repeat IRT level not elevated, 14 without a screened CFTR mutation, and one with missing data). The sensitivities of the protocols were 86.6% for IRT/IRT, 89.9% for IRT/p.F508del, and 95.8% for IRT/12 mutations. Including 12 mutations in the analysis detected one patient who would otherwise have been missed and, had this protocol been implemented from 1989, it would have detected four others. Conclusion: Most babies with CF without meconium ileus, a family history or I antenatal diagnosis are detected by newborn screening. Despite improved sensitivity with the 12-mutation analysis, most infants detected would have been diagnosed using the IRT/p.F508del protocol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据