4.7 Article

Reconstruction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal

期刊

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1550-1564

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.07.004

关键词

Fetal MRI; 3D reconstruction; Super-resolution; Bias field; Intensity matching

资金

  1. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering - Personalised Healthcare [WT 088877/Z/09/Z]
  2. MRC [MR/K006355/1, MC_U120088465, MC_U120061309] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/K006355/1, MC_U120088465, MC_U120061309] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a method for the reconstruction of volumetric fetal MRI from 2D slices, comprising super-resolution reconstruction of the volume interleaved with slice-to-volume registration to correct for the motion. The method incorporates novel intensity matching of acquired 20 slices and robust statistics which completely excludes identified misregistered or corrupted voxels and slices. The reconstruction method is applied to motion-corrupted data simulated from MRI of a preterm neonate, as well as 10 clinically acquired thick-slice fetal MRI scans and three scan-sequence optimized thin-slice fetal datasets. The proposed method produced high quality reconstruction results from all the datasets to which it was applied. Quantitative analysis performed on simulated and clinical data shows that both intensity matching and robust statistics result in statistically significant improvement of super-resolution reconstruction. The proposed novel EM-based robust statistics also improves the reconstruction when compared to previously proposed Huber robust statistics. The best results are obtained when thin-slice data and the correct approximation of the point spread function is used. This paper addresses the need for a comprehensive reconstruction algorithm of 3D fetal MRI, so far lacking in the scientific literature. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据