4.5 Article

Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute?

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 89-96

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04045.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health [10/1008/07, HS&DR/10/1008/07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. ESRC [ES/G046387/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G046387/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [10/1008/07] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CONTEXT Education is a complex intervention which produces different outcomes in different circumstances. Education researchers have long recognised the need to supplement experimental studies of efficacy with a broader range of study designs that will help to unpack the 'how' and 'why' questions and illuminate the many, varied and interdependent mechanisms by which interventions may work (or fail to work) in different contexts. METHODS One promising approach is realist evaluation, which seeks to establish what works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, to what extent, and why. This paper introduces the realist approach and explains why it is particularly suited to education research. It gives a brief introduction to the philosophical assumptions underlying realist methods and outlines key principles of realist evaluation (designed for empirical studies) and realist review (the application of realist methods to secondary research). DISCUSSION The paper warns that realist approaches are not a panacea and lists the circumstances in which they are likely to be particularly useful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据