4.5 Article

Education beyond competencies: a participative approach to professional development

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 404-411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03601.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives New curricula for UK medical training emphasise work-based learning and assessment of competencies. It is debatable whether competency-orientated training is sufficient to prepare doctors for consultant clinical, managerial and professional roles. This article describes a novel approach to postgraduate medical education in palliative medicine for a small group of consultants and specialty trainees. The aim of the study was to extend learning beyond the behaviourist focus of competencies by sharing experience and knowledge through discussion of professional practice. Methods Seven doctors met weekly for a 2-hour specialty education session. Participative action research was conducted over four cycles in 2008. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured group discussions and interviews, together with participants' comments, modified the programme's structure and content. Results Participants developed a framework for discussion of educational subjects based on the specialty curriculum. Thematic analysis suggested that they valued others' experience and found learning through discussion with colleagues supportive and stimulating. Early preference for 'free-flowing' discussion was modified by recognition that structure in planning, preparation and summarising enhanced learning. The framework changed from a learner-led approach to one of collaboration with clearer roles for consultants and trainees. Conclusions It is important that doctors' education encompasses opportunities to share and develop expertise with experienced colleagues. The group developed an education programme for small-group learning based on social constructivist principles and learning within a community of practice. This was facilitated by the context for learning in palliative medicine and may be applicable to other specialties with small groups of trainees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据