4.4 Article

Access to care and use of preventive services by Hispanics - State-based variations from 1991 to 2004

期刊

MEDICAL CARE
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 507-515

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816dd966

关键词

access to care; disparities; race/ethnicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: State-level disparities in access to physicians and preventive services between Hispanics and whites may have changed over time. Objective: To assess state-based changes in Hispanics' access to physicians and preventive services from 1991 to 2004. Methods: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in the 10 states with the largest Hispanic populations, we examined 4 preventive services for eligible adults (mammography, Papanicolaou testing, colorectal cancer screening, and cholesterol testing) and 2 measures of access to physicians (obtaining routine checkup in prior 2 years and avoiding seeing physician when needed due to cost in prior year). In each state we assessed unadjusted and adjusted Hispanic-white access gaps and changes over time. Results: Hispanic-white access gaps persisted over time and varied widely by state. Disparities narrowed and became nonsignificant in 2 states (Arizona and California) for mammography and 3 states (Nevada, New Mexico, and New York) for Pap testing. Other disparities increased and became significant (mammography in Texas; colorectal cancer screening in California, Colorado, and Texas; cholesterol testing in Florida and Nevada; routine checkups in Arizona and New Mexico). Disparities in lacking doctor visits due to cost remained large and significant over time in all states. Insurance status and education were the main contributors to Hispanic-white disparities and their impact increased over time. Conclusions: Although use of preventive services and access to physicians improved for both whites and Hispanics nationally, access gaps varied widely among states. Therefore, efforts to monitor and eliminate disparities should be conducted at both the national and state levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据