4.2 Article

Rad18 is required for long-term maintenance of spermatogenesis in mouse testes

期刊

MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
卷 126, 期 3-4, 页码 173-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2008.11.004

关键词

Rad18; Postreplication repair; Genomic stability; Ageing; Fertility; Spermatogenesis; Spermatogonia

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [180139, 18058017]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18058017] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining the integrity of spermatogenic stem cells is essential to transfer genetic information to a descendant. However, knowledge of maintenance of genetic stability in stem cells is still limited. RAD18 is critical for postreplication repair through mono- and multiubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) to maintain genomic stability. Mammalian RAD18 is highly expressed in the spermatocytes and the nuclei of a few spermatogonia in adult mice. To elucidate the physiological function of RAD18, we analyzed a phenotype of Rad18-/- mice. The mice were born and appeared to grow normally. Although the mice were fertile, fertility and testis weight decreased with age. Histological examination revealed normal spermatogenesis in almost all seminiferous tubules in Rad18-/- testes at 2 months old, and abnormal sperm could not be detected in the epididymis. However, 25% of the tubules lost almost all germ cells at 12 months. The seminiferous tubules frequently retained only late differentiated phase germ cells, suggesting that the exhaustion of spermatogonial stem cells leads to the loss of all germ cells in the seminiferous tubules. Wild-type germ cells were successfully transplanted into and colonized in the seminiferous tubules of aged Rad18-/- mice, indicating that Sertoli cells have a normal supportive function even in aged testes. We conclude that RAD18 is intrinsically required for the long-term maintenance of spermatogenesis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据