4.2 Article

Tracheal occlusion increases the rate of epithelial branching of embryonic mouse lung via the FGF10-FGFR2b-Sprouty2 pathway

期刊

MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT
卷 125, 期 3-4, 页码 314-324

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mod.2007.10.013

关键词

lung development; tracheal occlusion; mechanotransduction; branching morphogenesis; FGF10; congenital diaphragmatic hernia

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 44977, HL 074832-01, R01 HL075773-04, P01 HL060231-08, R01 HL044977-16, R01 HL075773, HL 60231, R01 HL044060-16, R01 HL044060, HL75773, R01 HL044977, R01 HL074832, P01 HL060231] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tracheal occlusion during lung development accelerates growth in response to increased intraluminal pressure. In order to investigate the role of internal pressure on murine early lung development, we cauterized the tip of the trachea, to occlude it, and thus to increase internal pressure. This method allowed us to evaluate the effect of tracheal occlusion on the first few branch generations and on gene expression. We observed that the elevation of internal pressure induced more than a doubling in branching, associated with increased proliferation, while branch elongation speed increased 3-fold. Analysis by RT-PCR showed that Fgf10, Vegf, Sprouty2 and Shh mRNA expressions were affected by the change of intraluminal pressure after 48 h of culture, suggesting mechanotransduction via internal pressure of these key developmental genes. Tracheal occlusion did not increase the number of branches of Fgfr2b(-/-) mice lungs nor of wild type lungs cultured with Fgfr2b antisense RNA. Tracheal occlusion of Fgf10(Lacz/-) hypomorphic lungs led to the formation of fewer branches than in wild type. We conclude that internal pressure regulates the FGF10-FGFR2b-Sprouty2 pathway and thus the speed of the branching process. Therefore pressure levels, fixed both by epithelial secretion and boundary conditions, can control or modulate the branching process via FGF10-FGFR2b-Sprouty2. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据