4.5 Article

Manipulation of in vivo iron levels can alter resistance to oxidative stress without affecting ageing in the nematode C. elegans

期刊

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 133, 期 5, 页码 282-290

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2012.03.003

关键词

C. elegans; Iron homeostasis; Fenton reaction; Oxidative damage; Ageing; EPR spectroscopy

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK)
  2. European Commission
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Medical Research Council [G0700729B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron-catalyzed generation of free radicals leads to molecular damage in vivo, and has been proposed to contribute to organismal ageing. Here we investigate the role of free iron in ageing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Media supplementation with Fe(III) increased free iron levels in vivo, as detected by continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and elevated expression of the iron-sensitive reporter transgene pftn-1::gfp. Increased free iron levels caused elevated levels of protein oxidation and hypersensitivity to tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BOOH) given 9 mM Fe(III) or greater, but 15 mM Fe(III) or greater was required to reduce lifespan. Treatment with either an iron chelator (deferoxamine) or over-expression of ftn-1, encoding the iron sequestering protein ferritin, increased resistance to t-BOOH and, in the latter case, reduced protein oxidation, but did not increase lifespan. Expression of ftn-1 is greatly increased in long-lived daf-2 insulin/IGF-1 receptor mutants. In this context, deletion of ftn-1 decreased t-BOOH resistance, but enhanced both daf-2 mutant longevity and constitutive dauer larva formation, suggesting an effect of ferritin on signaling. These results show that high levels of iron can increase molecular damage and reduce lifespan, but overall suggest that iron levels within the normal physiological range do not promote ageing in C elegans. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据