4.5 Review

Signaling pathways in mitochondrial dysfunction and aging

期刊

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 131, 期 7-8, 页码 536-543

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2010.07.003

关键词

Mitochondria; ROS; Autophagy; Apoptosis; Aging

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, European Union
  2. Italian Space Agency (ASI)
  3. NIH [1P01AG025532-01A1]
  4. Cariparo Foundation (Padova)
  5. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)
  6. University of Padova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are central players in the determination of cell life and death. They are essential for energy production, since most cellular ATP is produced in their matrix by the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. At the same time, mitochondria are the main regulators of apoptotic cell death, mediating both extrinsic (cell-surface receptor mediated) and intrinsic apoptotic pathways. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate as side products of the electron transport chain, causing mitochondria! damage. Nonfunctional mitochondria accumulate in aged individuals, and cell homeostasis is maintained by removing damaged mitochondria by an autophagic process called mitophagy. In addition, mitochondrial ROS represent signaling molecules leading to autophagy, consisting in the bulk degradation of cytosolic portions. When cell homeostasis is perturbed, and cytosolic components are damaged, autophagy represents a defense mechanism aimed at removing non-functional proteins and organelles. If this is not sufficient, cell death occurs with distinct morphological hallmarks from apoptosis. This binary choice integrates a number of critical information converging on a number of common regulatory elements. In this review, the focus will be placed on the central role of mitochondria in the cross-talk between autophagy and apoptosis, highlighting the signaling pathways and molecular machinery impinging on these organelles. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据