4.7 Article

Effects of irradiation hardening and creep on the thermo-mechanical behaviors in inert matrix fuel elements

期刊

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 110-123

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.05.008

关键词

Inert matrix fuel element; Three-dimensional constitutive relations; Finite strain plasticity; Irradiation damage; Creep; Fern

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11172068, 91226101, 11272092, 11072062, 91026005]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110071110013]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01020304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An inert matrix fuel element consists of metal cladding and a composite fuel meat with the nuclear fuel particles embedded into the metal inert matrix. In order to precisely predict its in-pile thermo-mechanical coupling behaviors, the three-dimensional finite-strain constitutive relation is developed featuring consideration of the irradiation hardening plasticity and irradiation creep for the metal matrix and cladding; accordingly, several ABAQUS subroutines are built and validated to simulate irradiation swelling of the fuel particles and the above irradiation damage effects in the metal materials. Computation of the in-pile thermo-mechanical behaviors evolution is implemented. Compared to the calculation results considering only the irradiation hardening plasticity, the obtained results demonstrate that with the irradiation creep effect further included: (1) the mechanical interaction between the fuel particles and the matrix is weakened; (2) the maximum Mises stress and principal stress in the cladding tend to be very low; (3) similarly, the interfacial tensile stresses at the interface between the fuel meat and cladding also appear to be relatively smaller at higher burnup, and the interfacial shear stresses are close to zero; (4) the thickness increment of the fuel plate becomes comparably larger. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据