4.3 Article

Spring-in and Warpage - Progress in Simulating Manufacturing Aspects

期刊

MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 193-200

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11029-013-9335-5

关键词

fiber composites; manufacturing; semianalytical models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After demolding, plane structures made of fibrous polymer-matrix composites often show a warpage and, owing to spring-in angles, do not reach the designed shape. Considerable effort has been put into the development of methods for simulating the distortions in order to avoid them by countermeasures. Besides the empirical trial-and-error-based procedure, there is a choice between simulation-based and semianalytical approaches. This paper focuses on the latter ones as being fast and sufficiently accurate for an initial design. Spring-in is observed in curved structures. A simple formula relates the amount of spring-in to the difference between their in-plane and transverse properties. Furthermore, it has been shown that an equivalent coefficient of thermal expansion can be determined with the use of L-shaped coupons. With the aid of this coefficient, the spring-in of more complex structures can be calculated with a sufficient accuracy. Experiments reveal a considerable warpage of plain structures, especially of slender plates. This happens in the cases of one-sided molds, obviously depends on the part/tool connectivity, and is caused by the difference in thermal expansion, as well as by the development of cross-linking in the thickness direction. Other parameters of influence may be gradients in the fiber volume fraction or resin-rich layers. A simple formula based on a model of two beams on top of each other was developed. It relates the artificial coefficients of thermal expansion to the curvature of the compound beam. Warpage measurements on simple test specimens allow one to determine these coefficients, which then can be used in detailed FEM analyses of more complex structures in order to anticipate their behavior on demolding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据