期刊
MEAT SCIENCE
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 577-587出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.001
关键词
Authentication; Authenticity; Fraud; Meat; Meat fraud; Meat products; Mislabelling
In recent years, interest in meat authenticity has increased. Many consumers are concerned about the meat they eat and accurate labelling is important to inform consumer choice. Authentication methods can be categorised into the areas where fraud inmost likely to occur: meat origin, meat substitution, meat processing treatment and non-meat ingredient addition. Within each area the possibilities for fraud can be subcategorised as follows: meat origin sex, meat cuts, breed, feed intake, slaughter age, wild versus farmed meat, organic versus conventional meat, and geographic origin; meat substitution meat species, fat, and protein; meat processing treatment irradiation, fresh versus thawed meat and meat preparation; non-meat ingredient addition additives and water. Analytical methods used in authentication are as diverse as the authentication problems, and include a diverse range of equipment and techniques. This review is intended to provide an overview of the possible analytical methods available for meat and meat products authentication. In areas where no authentication methods have been published, possible strategies are suggested. (C) 2010 The American Meat Science Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据