4.7 Article

The durability of superhydrophobic films

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 1647-1657

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.005

关键词

Superhydrophobic; Tetraethoxysilane; Water contact angle; XPS; FTIR

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC 102-2221-E-224-049-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superhydrophobic sol-gels, spin-coated on a glass substrate, were synthesized by varying the hexamethyldisilazane/tetraethoxysilane ratio (Ratio) from 1 to 2. A simple heat treatment at 200 degrees C for 2 h, an additional prolonged heat treatment at 200 degrees C for 24 h, and an additional prolonged electric field aging for 24h with specimens connected to the positive or negative electrodes were performed. The specimens were subjected to a water impact test (WIT) for 2 h, and water contact angle (WCA) and sliding angle (SA) were measured before and after WIT. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were employed to analyze the variations of elements and functional groups in the hydrophobic film before and after the WIT. The variations of area ratio of XPS deconvolution peaks showed that during the WIT more SiO2 groups than OSi(CH3)(3) groups were washed away in the hydrophobic film. Molecular simulation provided a complete image showing the molecules constituting the surface of the hydrophobic film before and after WIT. The additional heat and electric field treatment induced Si OH network and vertical arrays of hydroxyl chains, respectively, which exerted viscous forces on the water drops but also mitigated the impact strength of the water column. Hence, before WIT, the specimen with a simple heat treatment at 200 degrees C for 2 h exhibited the highest WCA and lowest SA. After the WIT at a Ratio of 1.6, 1.8, and 2, SA increased in the following order: additional 24-h heat-treated specimen < electric field aging negative electrode specimen < electric field aging positive electrode specimen < simple heat-treated specimen. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据