4.5 Article

On the performance of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry for breath-relevant gas matrices

期刊

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/24/12/125003

关键词

gas calibration unit; proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry; relative humidity; limit of detection; carbon dioxide; volatile organic compounds

资金

  1. Center of Excellence in Medicine and IT (CEMIT), Innsbruck
  2. European Commission (Project BAMOD) [LSHC-CT-2005-019031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accuracy of quantitative volatile organic compound (VOC) detection by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) is substantially enhanced if the instrument is calibrated. Although quantification of a compound is in principle possible by mathematical methods based on kinetic theory, the underlying picture can become complicated depending on the gas matrix, leading to error. A simple, reliable method to overcome this is to calibrate the instrument using standard gas mixtures containing VOCs at known concentrations, which enables the compound-dependent sensitivity of the instrument to be determined. A dynamic gas calibration unit was developed to generate variable but known quantities of selected standard compounds in a carrier gas of variable relative humidity (RH; up to 100% at 37 degrees C) and CO2 content (<= 10%(v)) to reflect the changing conditions of a breath-gas sample matrix. Besides individual compound sensitivities, calibration also yields the limits of detection and quantification of the experimental method. Extensive calibrations of PTR-MS with several breath-relevant compounds were made at varying RH and CO2. Gas matrix effects of several compounds were negligible when appropriate mass-dependent transmission correction and normalization to the primary ions (m/z 21 and m/z 37) were applied. Two compounds are discussed in particular, namely acetaldehyde, which interferes with a CO2-related background, and formaldehyde, which shows a nonlinear dependence on sample gas humidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据