4.7 Article

Experimental assessment of high-rate GPS receivers for deformation monitoring of bridge

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 420-432

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.07.018

关键词

Bridge health monitoring; Global positioning system; High-rate GPS receiver; Wavelet packet

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51121005, 51178083, 51222806]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0287]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China [201102030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bridge engineer has long needed methods of accurate global displacement measurement for use in construction and more recently in the areas of bridge health monitoring. In this paper, the reliability and practicability of using high-rate carrier phase global positioning system (GPS) receivers are investigated to characterize dynamic oscillations of bridges. Initially, the short baseline trial is conducted to study the precision and characteristics of such kind of receivers as well as the potential applications of such a high-frequency data rate. After that, the performance of high-rate GPS receivers for dynamic response tracking is validated against accelerometers through controlled experimental tests and a novel kind of wavelet packet-based filtering method is also proposed. Finally, on-site dynamic experiments are carried out to measure the bridge deck oscillation induced by different external loads. Observed data are compared with predicted values derived from modeling undertaken with the finite element (FE) analysis software. The results of all the experiments proved to be very encouraging, and showed that high-rate GPS receiver is successful in quantifying both environmental induced bridge vibrations and high-frequency transient motion caused by vehicle loading, providing the ability for verification and/or improvement of structural design and modeling. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据