4.6 Review

The Prognostic Importance of Weight Loss in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
卷 89, 期 10, 页码 1368-1377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.04.033

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Science [TL1 TR000137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the prognostic impact of weight loss on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic effects of weight loss in patients with CAD on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiac events considering studies published between January 1, 1964, and August 8, 2013. We considered weight loss intentional when it occurred in the presence of programmed therapeutic lifestyle changes and observational when no such intervention was specified. Results: We searched 1218 abstracts, of which 12 studies with 14 cohorts met the inclusion criteria. A total of 35,335 patients (mean age, 64 years; 72% male; body mass index [BMI], 30; 3.2 years of follow-up) were included. Overall, weight loss was associated with a greater risk of the composite outcome (relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00-1.69; P=.05). However, heterogeneity was high (I-2 = 90%) and was substantially explained by weight loss intentionality. Presumed intentional weight loss (4 cohorts) was associated with improved outcomes (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; P<.001), whereas observational weight loss (10 cohorts) was associated with worsened outcomes (RR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26-2.08; P<.001; interaction P<.001). Conclusion: Whereas observational weight loss is associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events, intentional weight loss is associated with lower clinical events. These results suggest that the underlying mechanism of weight loss (ie, intentional or unintentional) affects its impact on subsequent risk in persons with known CAD. (C) 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据