4.6 Article

Perioperative Cognitive Decline in the Aging Population

期刊

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
卷 86, 期 9, 页码 885-893

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0332

关键词

-

资金

  1. Elan/Wyeth Alzheimer's Immunotherapy Program North American Advisory Board
  2. Novartis
  3. Alzheimer's Association, Forest, University of California
  4. University Medical School
  5. Colloquium Paris
  6. Ipsen
  7. Wenner-Gren Foundations
  8. Social Security Administration
  9. Korean Neurological Association
  10. National Institutes of Health
  11. Washington University at St. Louis
  12. Banner Alzheimer's Institute
  13. Veterans Affairs Central Office, Beijing Institute of Geriatrics, Innogenetics
  14. New York University
  15. Neuro Vigil, Inc
  16. CHRU-Hopital Roger Salengro
  17. Siemens
  18. AstraZeneca
  19. Geneva University Hospitals
  20. Lilly
  21. University of California
  22. San Diego-ADNI
  23. Paris University
  24. Institut Catala de Neurosciencies Aplicades
  25. University of New Mexico School of Medicine
  26. Pfizer
  27. NIA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elderly patients who have an acute Illness or who undergo surgery often experience cognitive decline. The pathophysiologic mechanisms that cause neurodegeneration resulting in cognitive decline, including protein deposition and neuroInflammation, also play a role in animal models of surgery-Induced cognitive decline. With the aging of the population, surgical candidates of advanced age with underlying neurodegeneration are encountered more often, raising concerns that, in patients with this combination, cognitive function will precipitously decline postoperatively. This special article is based on a symposium that the University of California, San Francisco, convened to explore the contributions of surgery and anesthesia to the development of cognitive decline In the aged patient. A road map to further elucidate the mechanisms, diagnosis, risk factors, mitigation, and treatment of postoperative cognitive decline in the elderly is provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据