4.6 Article

Association between inflammatory markers and frailty in institutionalized older men

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 329-333

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.014

关键词

Frailty; Inflammatory markers; Institutionalization

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 97-2314-B-010-002-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine whether higher serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with frailty in the older institutionalized men. Participants: The study enrolled 386 residents from a veterans care home in northern Taiwan in 2007. All participants were men. Residents younger than 65 years or with acute illness were excluded. Methods: Frailty status was determined based on the frailty phenotype (indicators include weight loss, exhaustion, and low grip strength, slow walking speed). Participants with 3 or more of the indicators were defined as frail, with 1 or 2 as intermediate frail, with no as non-frail. Serum IL-6, TNF-alpha, and hsCRP levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and modeled as tertile for severely skewed distributions. Results: The mean age of the participants was 81.5 +/- 4.9 years. The percentages of frail were 33.2%, intermediate frail 59.1% and nonfrail 7.8%. Higher IL-6 level was positively associated with the frail status. Adjusting for age, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbid conditions, serum IL-6 showed significant trend across frailty categories (P=0.03 [95% CI 1.40-5.24]). No significant associations of TNF-alpha, and CRP level with frailty were observed. An IL-6 level of 1.79 pg/mL had the optimal predictive value for frailty, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.66 (P=0.01 [95% CI 0.53-0.78]). Conclusion: Higher serum levels of IL-6 were associated with frailty status in the older institutionalized men with multiple comorbidities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据