4.6 Article

Low dose estriol pessaries for the treatment of vaginal atrophy: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of pessaries containing 0.2 mg and 0.03 mg estriol

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 360-368

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.022

关键词

Vaginal atrophy; Postmenopausal; Local treatment; Estriol; Low-dose formulation; Vaginal dryness

资金

  1. Dr. Kade Pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of the study was to confirm the superior efficacy of estriol containing pessaries compared to placebo in the treatment of vaginal atrophy. Study design: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 436 postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy (vaginal maturation index, VMI < 40%; vaginal pH > 5; most bothersome symptom, MBS >= 65 on visual analogue scale, VAS) were treated with pessaries containing either 0.2 mg estriol (N=142) or 0.03 mg estriol (N=147) or with a matching placebo (N=147) for 12 weeks. Main outcome measures: Primary efficacy endpoints included increase in VMI, decrease of the vaginal pH value and decrease in intensity of MBS after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: The increase in VMI was significantly greater under 0.2 mg estriol and 0.03 mg estriol (46.3 +/- 17.0 and 38.4 +/- 19.4, respectively) compared to placebo (23.9 +/- 21.5; p values <0.001), vaginal pH decreased significantly more (-1.6 +/- 0.8 and -1.4 +/- 0.9, respectively) compared to placebo (-0.6 +/- 0.8; p values < 0.001) and MBS intensity (VAS) declined significantly more (-52.2 +/- 23.7 and -47.1 +/- 23.4, respectively) compared to placebo (-31.8 +/- 26.3; p values <0.001). Adverse events were rare and occurred at similar rates in all three groups. Conclusions: Superiority of estriol containing pessaries over placebo was shown in the local treatment of vaginal atrophy. Even a very low dose of 0.03 mg estriol proved sufficient for local treatment of vaginal atrophy with excellent tolerability. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据