4.6 Article

Women's voices in the menopause: Results from an international survey on vaginal atrophy

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 233-238

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.08.001

关键词

Attitude; Menopause; Survey; Vaginal atrophy

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Health FemCare AG, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To consider issues relating to vaginal atrophy via an international survey. Methods: Using a structured questionnaire, interviews were performed on 4246 women aged 55-65 years living in Sweden, Finland, the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada. Results: Overall, 98% of survey respondents were postmenopausal. Thirty-nine percent of the postmenopausal women had experienced vaginal atrophy, with the prevalence varying between countries, from 34% in Canada to 43% in Finland and the United States. Attitudes towards symptoms also varied between countries. Symptoms were described as moderate or severe by less than half of women from Finland and Sweden, compared with nearly two-thirds of women from the United States. However, vaginal atrophy was deemed to impact on quality of life by a higher proportion of women in Finland and Sweden (>= 60%) than in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada (<= 50%). Overall, 77% of respondents believed women were uncomfortable discussing vaginal atrophy and 42% did not know that local treatment was available. The proportions of women unaware of the availability of local treatment were higher in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada (51%, 50% and 48%, respectively), and very low in Finland (10%). Whilst 63% of women who had experienced vaginal atrophy had never been prescribed treatment for the condition, 67% of those who had been treated reported positive effects. Conclusion: The survey results illustrate differing needs of menopausal women in different countries. Country-specific approaches may be required to improve the uptake of treatment for vaginal atrophy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据