4.6 Article

Resistance training prevents liver fat accumulation in ovariectomized rats

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 259-267

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.02.005

关键词

restrictive diet; hepatic steatosis; plasma FFA; leptin; muscle mass; estrogens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Menopause is associated with increased lipid deposition in the liver and fat accumulation in the abdomen. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of adding a resistance training program (RT) to a restrictive diet (RD) on liver lipid accumulation and abdominal fat depots in ovariectomized (Ovx) rats. Methods: One group of sham-operated and three groups of Ovx rats were compared. Five weeks after surgery, Ovx rats were either submitted to an similar to 25% RD with or without RT for 3 or 8 weeks, while a third group-of Ovx rats were fed ad libitum and remained sedentary. The RT program consisted of climbing a 6 in vertical metal grill five times a week with an increasing load up to 75% of body weight attached to the tail. The number of repetitions increased from two to four sets of 10 repetitions. Results: Ovariectomy resulted insignificantly higher (P < 0.01) body weight, energy intake, intra-abdominal fat depots, plasma leptin levels (P < 0.05), and liver triacylglycerol concentrations. All of these responses were (P < 0.01) reduced in Ovx rats following the RD with the exception of liver lipid infiltration. The addition of RT to the RD treatment synergistically reduced abdominal fat deposition and plasma-free fatty acid levels. Moreover, liver lipid infiltration was completely prevented by the addition of the RT program. Muscle mass relative to body weight was significantly increased in Ovx-RD-RT compared to all other groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that RT is an asset to minimize the deleterious effects of ovarian hormone withdrawal on liver lipid accumulation and abdominal fat accumulation in Ovx rats. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据